By Anne Vazquez
Published in the February 2009 issue of Today's Facility Manager

The Kansas City, MO campus of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has
entered its peak operating season. With about 4,000 people currently
working in the facility (about 2,000 of those as seasonal employees for
tax processing), the 1.1 million square foot facility is occupied 24
hours a day as workers process a major portion of the nation’s 1040
returns there.
Joseph R. Campfield, CFM, RPA, FMA is director of
building operations at the campus, and he makes it a point to prepare
for the influx of occupants as the flurry of processing activity
begins. “I look for the projects that need to be done in order to
provide the optimum performance of the building during the peak
season,” he says. “From now through the end of June, [the building
operations department] stays out of the way as much as possible.”
While
facility management (FM) can be an unpredictable job at times,
Campfield addresses the maintenance tasks he can predict. During the
summer months, he and his staff perform alarm testing, repair and
inspect elevators, change light bulbs, paint when necessary, and do
heavy cleaning.
As a result, the busiest time for his operations
department is during that non-peak season. FM staff then “spend the
following six months trying not to interfere with the IRS activities,”
explains Campfield. “We try to be ‘invisible’ during that time.”
Building The Campus
Heading up the daily operation of the IRS Kansas City campus,
Campfield has been working at the site since about four months after
construction began on the government facility in 2004. His firm, MC
Realty Group, LLC, provides FM services to meet the needs of the IRS.
During
construction, Campfield was able to familiarize himself with the
facility by observing the process, taking photographs, and attending
meetings. He also took the opportunity to offer input from his FM
perspective. “I was able to interject concerns about the way the
facility was being built—whether there were enough water lines put into
the mechanical rooms, for instance.
“Some of these things were
‘low hanging fruit,’” Campfield adds. “It didn’t cost a lot to make the
change during construction, and the benefit that it would provide was
well worth it. [The FM team] was able to suggest a lot of constructive
changes.”
The campus was created by connecting an existing post
office (built in 1933) with a new 660,000 square foot addition. The six
story post office (now the Pershing Building) was extensively renovated
to house the administrative offices of IRS employees.
Alterations
to the post office included removing the center of the four lower
levels in order to create an atrium spanning up six floors; the top two
floors of the building were already serving as an atrium space. The
campus was slated for (and achieved) LEED Certified for New
Construction (NC) designation from the U.S. Green Building Council, and
expanding the atrium helped the project team achieve some of the
daylighting requirements.
The former post office houses the
campus’ year round population. This includes director and management
level employees, administrative support personnel, and IT staff members.
Built
onto the existing structure were three processing wings dedicated to
the business of handling federal tax returns. Known as the Pennway
Complex, this part of the IRS campus is not equipment heavy. Still,
Campfield says, these spaces were designed with an assembly line
layout. “The design of the facility allows the tax returns to enter
from the south end,” he explains. “As the materials progress north
through [the Pennway Complex], they go through the different stages
required.”
Before this campus was built, the IRS was operating
out of a number of smaller facilities in the Kansas City area. With
process improvements and the desire to increase efficiencies, the
government agency began planning in 2000 for a consolidated operation
under one roof. Working with the U.S. General Services Administration
(GSA) and Jacobs Facilities, Inc. of Berwyn, PA, the IRS developed a
plan for the building configuration that would best serve its mission.
Green Governance
Since LEED certification was set as one goal for the campus the
architecture firm, Berkbile Nelson Immenschuh McDowell (BNIM)/360
Architecture of Kansas City, worked with the rest of the project team
to incorporate environmentally friendly features on the site and in the
facility.
Notable site strategies in pursuing LEED certification
included restoring a minimum of 50% of the area not within the building
footprint with native plantings, implementing a stormwater management
plan that has resulted in a 28% decrease (rate and quantity) in run off
from calculated pre-project conditions, and locating a minimum of 50%
of the 3,800 on-site parking stalls in an underground garage.
Strategies
used for the facility included 65,000 square feet of vegetative roof,
along with 550,000 square feet of a LEED compliant cool roof.
Inside,
indoor air quality (IAQ) was addressed by specifying adhesives,
sealants, paints, carpeting, and composite wood materials that complied
with volatile organic compound (VOC) limits set by LEED requirements.
Campfield
and his team maintain the IAQ standards by purchasing products that
comply with LEED specifications. Part of this effort is choosing
products used in the construction of the facility. However, there are
situations where there is no precedent, and the FM team must decipher
what products are acceptable.
“We need to watch what our
contractors and vendors bring into the facility,” says Campfield. “We
talk to the contractors as well as our own maintenance staff to make
sure we are using materials and products that meet the requirements
under which the facility was designed.
“We have to read and
understand what the materials are and what we are bringing into the
facility,” he continues. “Normally, I go straight to the MSDS [material
safety data sheet] for a product. We will also try to do some Internet
shopping, pull up the cut sheets on the material we would like to use,
and then go to the MSDS to read the specs.”
Driving Efficiencies
Energy efficiency was a focus of the campus design, and two major
systems that Campfield uses to pursue this goal are a Web-based
building automation system (BAS) for the entire facility and an
underfloor air distribution (UFAD) system, which serves the Pennway
Complex.
The BAS is used to control the UFAD system as well as
the other HVAC equipment at the campus. Featuring 26,000 control
points, the BAS is also tied into a carbon monoxide (CO) monitoring
system located in the parking garage.
A Chat With Joseph R. Campfield
What are your responsibilities at the IRS Kansas City campus? I’m
in charge of building operations, including heating, cooling,
structural issues, roofing, and the parking areas. I am responsible for
anything that is on this 26 acre site. I also work as the project
manager; if the IRS needs something done with regard to the facility,
it is brought to me and my team to accomplish it.
How long have you been in the facility management (FM) profession? I’ve
been in the industry for about 13 years. I started off as an HVAC
technician, and that is where my skill set is. I’ve worked in that
realm for 36 years [including in FM].
Since you’ve been in FM, what changes have occurred in the profession that have made your work more difficult, or easier? I’m
seeing as a trend with the group I work with—and I think it’s pretty
much nationwide—of stakeholders seeking process improvement. They want
to know how to run their buildings more efficiently, and most recently
there’s a real desire to get involved in sustainability.
That
focus on sustainability has changed our jobs, because we have to get
the buy-in of not only occupants, but also our maintenance and
engineering staff. For instance, this facility has waterless urinals,
and that required some education at first. Now, after a little over two
years in the facility, we have not had any issue with those. It’s
getting the people who are going to be using the technology to buy into
it.
With this facility up and running, what other projects are you working on? We
have contracted with a local firm to come in and perform an energy
audit to help us identify areas where we can continue to improve. The
IRS is going to be here for a long time, and we need to continue making
the facility more efficient. Lighting technology is changing almost
daily. So, we are bringing in an engineering team to look at the
facility and help us continue the process improvement. Initially, the
team will take a high level overview to give us its thoughts on where
we can get the biggest bang for our dollar’s worth.
One system the BAS does not control is lighting. Says Campfield, “We
can link into the lighting controls system from our BAS, but it is not
controlled through that system.”
Instead, there are two methods
of lighting control, explains Campfield. “The basic workspaces were
outfitted with motion sensors,” he says. “This has been helpful for
churn and space reconfiguration, because if we have a major occupancy
change, we can reconfigure how the lighting sensors are connected
within the fixtures. We do not have to open walls or redo light
switches.”

Meanwhile, the processing wings were equipped with a
different computer based system to control the high bay lighting (both
direct and indirect) in those spaces.
The UFAD system also
differentiates the processing wings from the administrative Pershing
Building. The GSA specified this type of system for both its
flexibility and targeted airflow. Campfield has discovered the benefits
of both these qualities.
“Say I have a work group that needs to
move its desks 3' feet in order to improve efficiencies,” he says. “In
a standard building, that might literally set 50 people right on top of
the registers that were built for the area. With the UFAD system, we
can lift up the floor tiles in that area and move the air diffuser
below (which is actually a full VAV box) to where we need it in the
floor. In a short period of time, we can reconfigure the registers to
get the best air distribution for the new furniture configuration.”
Recalling
the initial move in 2006, Campfield adds, “As large as this facility
is, the design team did a great job with initial configuration. Still,
when the furniture was moved in, there were a few furniture/register
conflicts. Instead of it being a major issue, the construction team was
able to relocate a few registers to fix the conflicts.”
On the
energy side, the UFAD system presents more opportunity to increase
energy efficiency. “We are able to run higher discharge air
temperatures on the system, which by design saves energy,” says
Campfield. “For us, the UFAD has been very successful.”
The
campus will hover around peak occupancy for the next few months, which
means that building services to the processing wings will be in full
swing. In terms of energy use, the demand will drop after the middle of
year.
“The design of the facility is such that I could isolate
and shut down energy consumption in any or all three wings
independently,” explains Campfield. “With the UFAD, we can identify the
unoccupied zones and put those in a setback to conserve energy that
way.”
The vastness of the IRS Kansas City campus challenges the
FM team to manage with efficiency in mind. Fortunately, the original
design and Campfield’s expertise are keeping those goals in reach.
This article was based on an interview with Campfield.
To share your new construction or renovation story, send an e-mail to avazquez@groupc.com. To view past cast studies, click this link. Discuss this subject and others in real time at FacilityBlog or post your comments below.
Project Information:
Name of Organization: Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Type of Construction: New facility built onto existing, historic building. Function of Facility: Government (administrative and tax processing). Location: Kansas City, MO. Square Footage: 1.14 million. Budget: $350,000,000. Construction Timetable: February 2004 to December 2006. Cost Per Square Foot: $307. Facility Owner: Pershing Road Development Company, LLC. Facility Manager: Joseph R. Campfield, CFM, RPA, FMA, director of building operations. Architect: Berkebile Nelson Immenschuh McDowell (BNIM)/360 Architecture. General Contractor/Construction Manager: JE Dunn Construction Company. Electrical Engineer/Lighting Designer: Gibbons Drake and Scott, Inc.; Mark One Electric Company, Inc. Mechanical Engineer: Langford and Associates; U.S. Engineering Company. Structural Engineer: Structural Engineering Associates. Civil Engineer: Taliaferro & Browne, Inc. Interior Designer: BNIM/360 Architecture; Jacobs. Landscape Architect: BNIM/360 Architecture. Other Consultants:
BNIM/360 Architecture (LEED certification); Kroll Schiff &
Associates, Inc. (security); ViroCon, Inc. (commissioning agent).
Product Information:
Furniture: Haworth; Herman Miller; Teknion. Flooring: Amtico International; Armstrong; Desco Coatings, Inc.; Tate (access floors). Carpet: Shaw. Ceilings: USG Interiors, Inc. Wall Coverings/Textiles: Benjamin Moore; Scuffmaster. Movable Walls: Skyfold Mirage. Building Management System: Johnson Controls, Inc. Security System Components: General Electric; Honeywell. Fire Alarms: Siemens. Safety Equipment:
General Automatic Sprinkler Fire Protection; National Fire Suppression
(fire sprinklers); Kidde (fire extinguishers); Vulcain (carbon monoxide
detectors); Siemens (annunciators/strobes). Lighting Controls/ Sensors: WattStopper. Lighting Fixtures: Luminaire. Ballasts: Advance; Lutron; OSRAM SYLVANIA. HVAC Equipment: Carrier; McQuay; Trane; York. Power Supply Equipment: Siemens. Back Up Power (UPS): Liebert. Roofing: Sika Sarnafil, Inc. Exit Signs: McPhilben. Other Signage: Star Signs. Windows: Insulite Glass Co., Inc. Window Treatments: Nysan (shades). Elevators/Escalators: Kone (moving walkways); Otis Elevator.